Sunday, December 19, 2010

Knowledge is the Treasure: Steven Spielberg's Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull



Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull opens, like the Indiana Jones adventures before it, with the Paramount logo dissolving into something literal (an actual mountain, a mountain on a gong, etc.). In each movie, the post logo reveal has given us a sense of time and place, but in this instance, it is disorienting. The first shot is of a tiny hill, and once the prairie dog pops through it, he is immediately scared away as a speeding car crushes over the dirt. What first almost feels like the director, Steven Spielberg, poking fun at the openings of the past, now takes on a greater weight. Seeing this creation of nature wrecked by a creation of man hints that we are in an age of destruction.

The car is filled with teenagers listening to Elvis, driving too fast and feeling the exhilaration of their youth. They come upon some military trucks and challenge one of them to a race, and seeing the two vehicles side by side provides a perfect metaphor of innocence vs. tact. The teens don't have a care in the world, as nothing in their lives has had consequence yet. The race ends when the military trucks take a detour by a sign labeled "Atomic Cafe" while the young and carefree fly away to continue growing and learning about the world. Unlike our still unseen hero, they have no idea that things are not going to stay that easy.

From the trunk of one of the military vehicles, our beloved Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford, the best he's ever been) is reborn. Fittingly, he's not revealed to us until his trademark fedora is placed firmly on his head. The first word he utters is "Russians," and it generates a tinge of excitement because we can see Indy is already in over his head. But there's something different when we look at him now. Unlike the teens from the opening sequence, he seems tired and less certain he will be able to get out of the current predicament ("We were younger. We had guns."). That doesn't stop him, of course, from outsmarting his captors when they force him to find a crate in the Area 51 warehouse.

We never would have expected to see Indiana Jones assisting in the recovery of "mummified remains" of this sort, but sure enough, the crate is opened and the content is the corpse of something that is not of this world. For Indy, seeing is not believing at this point. It will naturally take a journey for him to truly gain an understanding of an existence he currently doubts. This has been the case with all of his adventures, but the artifact he is protecting here will be harder to accept. Equally as hard though, are the changes in political climate. Paranoia runs rampant, you never know who can be trusted, and those around you are always preparing for the worst.

This last bit comes effectively into play when Indy stumbles upon a nuclear testing site made to look like a suburban neighborhood. Instead of just setting up a bunch of empty houses, trouble has been taken to supply every necessary detail to make this feel like a classic American suburb, complete with mannequins to represent husbands, wives, children, and even pets. Of course, if these bombs really get used, it won't be on Americans, so it's as if the people testing these weapons have to reverse the effect to see if they could possibly identify with how it feels to be in the wake of such destruction. The image of the creepy mannequin faces being obliterated is unsettling to say the least (I also couldn't help but think about Spielberg's own history with the destruction of the "nuclear" family).

The movie gets it's first iconic shot after Indy survives the blast. We watch as he observes the mushroom cloud engulfing the sky, but we never see his reaction to it. Time stops momentarily as our hero gets to take in the scope of something greater than any danger he has ever been lucky enough to escape. This threat is real. It's at this point in the movie that Indy begins to acknowledge that he's not a young man anymore. After being suspended from the college (on accusal of treason), he sits at his desk and looks at pictures of the two people he's lost: his father and Marcus Brody. Unfortunately, time does not stand still quite as often as it used to. Or as a colleague puts it, "We seem to have reached the age where life stops giving us things and starts taking them away."

Indy misses the father he never really knew. The disconnect between fathers and sons is a Spielberg trademark (best displayed, I think, in Catch Me If You Can), and it's one he will explore again here. Yes, Indy has a son named Mutt (Shia LaBeouf), a motorcycle riding greaser who needs our hero to help rescue his mother. Of course, it isn't until close to the middle of the picture that Mutt finds out Indy is his father; before now, he thought his step father was his real one. There's a genuine sense of disappointment as this tough kid tries to grasp the fact that his father is not a war hero (as he originally believed) but a teacher. The movie has fun playing with their relationship, with Mutt constantly commenting on Indy's age ("What are you, like 80?") and Indy getting onto Mutt about going back to school (before he knew Mutt was his son, he didn't care). It's amusing that he would pick on Mutt for not staying in school; after a chase sequence that ends in the campus library where Indy teaches, he informs the students that if they want to be good archaeologists, they "have to get out of the library."

Since this is an Indiana Jones movie, the plot involves a religious artifact being used to obtain the wrong kind of power. It's fitting given the time period that the artifact is the skull of an "inter-dimensional being," an element that drew a great amount of criticism from audiences. If Indy had punched one of these beings like Will Smith in Independence Day, I could see some rationality behind the complaints. But the screenplay by David Koepp is smarter than that, instead focusing on what these beings represent.

The idea of God is to acknowledge a presence greater than oneself. We learn late in the movie that an ancient tribe worshiped these beings since they came from the sky, and because they were taught farming and irrigation, tools that would help keep them alive. In other words, these beings gave them the knowledge to gain the necessities of life, and to honor them, the people tied ropes around their children's skulls to elongate them in the image of these "Gods." We are critical of what we do not understand, especially when it comes to religion (or to be more precise, a religion that is not ours), but Indy is familiar with the lengths people will go to pay tribute to what they believe is true ("Depends on who your God is.").

Since the days of the conquistadors, anyone seeking the skull has done so for selfish reasons, and now it is in the hands of Russian baddie Irina Spalko (Cate Blanchett). She sees the skull as a tool for psychic power, a way to obtain information that will assist in conquering others in times of war. To her, this is acceptable since people have used religion for personal gain for many years (she references how Oppenheimer quoted the Hindu bible when creating the atomic bomb). Of course, the riches that can be obtained are based on real faith, not blind, and it is for this reason Spalko is unable to tap into the skull ("The skull does not speak to everyone."). True faith comes from within (why else would they be inter-dimensional beings?), so it is to her discredit that she believes that her quest for knowledge is genuine. Ultimately, you have to ask the right questions and sometimes knowing the answers is not enough.

The prophet of the movie is Harold Oxley (John Hurt), a seemingly mad scientist who is able to see the light. His instability stems from the fact that the mind is often unable to grasp things as quickly as the soul. While he is able to supply nuggets of information ("The one who was lost." "Someone came."), they do not come full circle until the movie's final sequence when the characters go to return the skull to its rightful owner. It is here Spalko finally gets what she wished for, although neither her mind nor her soul have the capacity to sustain the "knowledge." There's a brilliant shot containing Indy and Spalko on the outsides of the frame and Oxley in the center; it's a perfect way to visually represent that what matters lies within.

In a movie full of awesome shots (this is Spielberg after all), it's hard to top the awe aspiring moment where the saucer takes off. It proves to be a fitting bookend to the mushroom cloud because once again, we look on as Indy does and do not see his reaction. But it's also the other moment in the picture when time stands still, however in this instance it is not a threat. The departure of these beings brings with it a sense of hope (what stands out most is that we don't see where the ship goes...once the rocks drop, it's just gone). When asked if they returned to space, Oxley suggests they went back to "the space between spaces." In other words, a place inhabited by a force greater than ourselves. Oxley's line gives greater weight to Indy's observation to Mutt that, "Somewhere your Grandpa is laughing."

I have yet to mention the action in the picture, maybe because I feel like those scenes are the least significant. They are tremendous fun, with Spielberg as always reminding us why he has yet to be matched when it comes to technical precision. If there is a piece of the action I need to note, it is in regards to the much maligned CGI. Most of the tomatoes thrown here are in regards to the sequence of Mutt swinging through the vines with the monkeys. While I will agree it is cheesy, I also feel it is a nice breather, since the last hour of the movie is basically wall-to-wall action set pieces. I also feel comfortable defending the CGI because this movie is a throwback to the science fiction pictures of the 1950s. All of the visuals here compliment the ridiculousness ("Big damn ants!") of old monster movies, and in addition, Indiana Jones taught us a long time ago that in his adventures, Anything Goes. This is an homage, so if the effects looked too slick, the purpose would be defeated.

The most satisfying scene is saved for last. Because Indy learned that time is not something he has control over, he finally ties the knot with Marion (Karen Allen, still feisty, but not feisty enough). As Oxley put it, "How much of human life is lost in wait." This appreciation for life leads Indy to snatch his hat when Mutt attempts to put it on. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is about realizing you are only immortal for a limited time, and sometimes it takes discovering something beyond one's understanding to realize that. The fact that the movie came almost twenty years after the last entry in the series makes perfect sense, as Spielberg is at the right age to identify with his hero's internal struggles. This is a personal project in a career full of personal projects, and it's those touches that make Spielberg's movies stand out as something special. With Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, it's easy to simply look and enjoy what's on the surface, but the reward will be much richer if you decide to look at what lies within.


Thank you for visiting Hell and Beyond!


(c) Hell and Beyond, 2010

Sunday, December 12, 2010

Spielberg Blogathon

I am very excited to announce I will be participating in a Spielberg Blogathon! Go to http://www.spielbergblogathon.blogspot.com for more details, and be on the lookout for my post in the upcoming weeks.




Thank you for visiting Hell and Beyond!

Saturday, December 4, 2010

"Now I'm Just A Traveling Man.": William Peter Blatty's The Exorcist III



William Friedkin said he wanted to direct The Exorcist because he felt it was about the mystery of faith. Knowing that, I have to wonder if that's why he and the writer, William Peter Blatty, had disagreements when it came to doing a followup. The two were going to re-team to do the sequel even before Blatty wrote his novel, Legion, which would become The Exorcist III for the big screen. But they were unable to see eye-to-eye (a problem they had on The Exorcist as well), so Friedkin backed out and Blatty wrote a novel instead. It did feature characters from the original novel and film, but they were not directly related. Years later, Blatty wrote a script and after deciding to direct, a studio was on board and a new movie was in the works.

Blatty wanted the movie to retain the title of his novel only, but the studio saw things differently. In their eyes, keeping The Exorcist in the title was key, although Blatty didn't want to be associated with the second movie, which was a disaster in every respect. Given his battle with the studio (which led to him re-shooting an ending that feels as tacked on as it is), it's an amazement that The Exorcist III works as well as it does (I've read many, including Blatty, who think it is scarier than The Exorcist). The reason for its success is due not only to the effective dialogue flowing through the screenplay, but also because of Blatty's knack for unsettling and genuinely frightening visuals. Watching the picture again, I had to wonder what the first movie would have been like had he directed it.

The movie takes place in Georgetown, fifteen years after the exorcism of Reagan McNeil and the death of Father Karras. Kinderman (George C. Scott), the cop investigating the deaths in the first movie, was also Karras's friend and is still haunted by what happened that night. He spends the anniversary of the event by going to see "It's A Wonderful Life," even though Kinderman doesn't think such a thing exists. He's spent the last fifteen years a skeptic, as he believes "the whole world is a homicide victim." He still spends time with priests, but not to make himself feel better. Instead, it gives him an opportunity to tell them what's wrong with the world and ask why God would allow such things to happen. His thoughts on the divine are best summed up when he looks at a snow globe, since everything that exists inside it is make believe. There's something envious about the way Kinderman studies it; you get the impression he wants to go behind the glass where it is safe.

Kinderman's already bleak life is made all the worse when a grisly murder occurs and it marks the pattern of a notorious killer, known as "Gemini," who was stopped years before. More murders follow, with each one more bizarre than the last. But while the first victim was a child, the next few are priests, one of which was Kinderman's friend and died in a hospital. This leads Kinderman to consult the head doctor (Scott Wilson, classic as always), and it is here that Blatty explores some of the same areas covered in The Exorcist. While the first picture deeply examined faith verses science, this movie puts them closer to the same level. There's a scene where the doctor has written out exactly what he is going to tell Kinderman when they meet and even refers to the script as he is talking, which in essence means that doctors and priests both must rehearse speeches to be clear about what they are saying. Neither one of them ever has real answers; only projections on paper.

The hospital becomes the key setting once Kinderman discovers a man in the mental ward who he swears is Father Karras (once again played by the awesome Jason Miller). His interviews with the patient reminds of Karras's conversations with the possessed Reagan, which makes perfect sense since Kinderman is a skeptic and at that time, so was Karras. Strangely, the patient knows the details of all the recent murders and even claims to be the "Gemini" killer himself. The movie effectively shifts back and forth between the face of Karras and the face of the real "Gemini" (played by an ultra creepy Brad Dourif), letting the audience know that while Kinderman does recognize this man on the outside, someone completely different lives within. It's as if Karras is being punished for saving Reagan. The fact he is still possessed by something shows that his faith never truly recovered.

The most intriguing scenes in The Exorcist III are the conversations between Kinderman and "Gemini." The dialogue is so rich and disturbing ("Gemini" talks about how a dismembered head can still see for twenty seconds after being removed, so he shows the victim their body) that the images conjured in one's mind are equally as scary to what Blatty cooks up onscreen. In addition, the scenes further extend Blatty's view that people are ultimately weak to the power of evil and it's a force beyond their control. Karras's body is proof of that, as the "Gemini" explains that the body is nothing more than a box for the spirit and these days, he's become a traveling man.

Blatty is able to pull off plenty of skin crawling visuals, the best of which is a sequence in the hospital that consists of a long hallway shot and great use of subtle noise. If the build up is nerve wracking, wait until you get to the payoff, which is a moment that gave me the worst goosebumps I have ever experienced (every time I see the movie I still get them, even though I know what is going to happen). Blatty makes a lot of the scares all the better by providing quick glimpses so our mind goes into overdrive trying to figure out what we just saw. It's a shame he has not directed a movie since The Exorcist III, although given his difficulties with the studio, I guess it is hard to blame him.

If there's a criticism I can give Blatty as a director, it's his overuse of close ups. Maybe it was because he was thrilled to be working with the great George C. Scott, who brings a lot of great moments (and a handful of overcooked ones) to the role of Kinderman. Not one of my favourite characters in the first movie, Kinderman has gone from a needless plot device to a fully realized man who only has faith and acceptance in the things right in front of him: death and destruction. Being a cop has become who he is, since he is incapable of turning his back on the bad around him (like he is unable to live without it). What's interesting is the fact he is able to find the negative even with the positive elements in his life (he tells an amusing story about why he can't go home because of what his wife is cooking).

I'm in agreement that the ending is the movie's greatest weakness. While there are certainly lacking moments here and there, none of them feel as abrupt and unnecessary as the exorcism that ends the picture. It would have been nice to have a showdown of words between Kinderman and "Gemini" but instead, we are treated to a barrage of special effects and demonic imagery. There hasn't been anything very bombastic about the rest of the movie, so to throw it in during the last ten minutes cheapens the journey a bit.

The Exorcist III was met with mixed reviews and fair box office returns, but it certainly didn't garner much real attention. Given the reputation of part two, this doesn't come as much of a surprise, although I view the movie as a stand alone piece and not an Exorcist movie, even though it does share some of the same ideas. Released in 1990, this probably was the first notable horror picture of the new decade. Despite its minor missteps, it has found an audience as the years have passed, and why shouldn't it? The Exorcist III is a reminder of when horror movies were not about grossing us out or tons of sharp cuts, but about finding inventive ways to creep us out of our wits. Twenty years later, it still succeeds.


Thank you for visiting Hell and Beyond!

(c) Hell and Beyond, 2010